
2025 marked an inflection point for the North American commercial vehicle industry. Instead of a steady post-pandemic recovery, the year unfolded as one of recalibration amid regulatory uncertainty, geopolitical shifts, original equipment manufacturer (OEM) restructuring and a move toward pragmatic powertrain strategies.
In this blog, we unpack how and why key defining regulatory, industry and powertrain developments reshaped North America’s commercial vehicle outlook.
The protectionist trade measures introduced in 2025 by the Trump administration increased acquisition costs for fleets, particularly those dependent on cross-border supply chains. This put pressure on OEM margins and prompted manufacturers to decrease near-term production at non-US plants.
At the same time, the softening of federal electric vehicle (EV) policy, including the rollback of EV tax credits, created uncertainty around incentives and slowed the adoption of electric commercial vehicles, especially in the medium- and heavy-duty segments. OEMs responded by scaling back EV production volumes, delaying capacity expansions and pivoting toward flexible, multi-powertrain strategies.
Heavy-duty truck demand was expected to rise ahead of new heavy-duty emissions standards set to take effect in 2027, but the Environmental Protection Agency decided to overturn the 2027 standards. This eliminated the economic incentive to pre-buy heavy-duty trucks ahead of 2027. Instead, fleets deferred purchases, OEMs revised near-term heavy-duty commercial vehicle demand outlooks and regulatory uncertainty added volatility to production planning.
OEMs accelerated investments to localize manufacturing in the United States:
General Motors discontinued production of the BrightDrop electric delivery vans at its CAMI Assembly plant in Ontario and confirmed the program will not be transferred to another facility, reflecting softer demand, regulatory changes and the withdrawal of key US tax incentives.
Slate Auto and Scout Motors emerged at opposite ends of the pickup value spectrum. While their near-term volume impact remains limited, their entry prompted legacy OEMs to reassess competition in light commercial vehicle and lifestyle pickups, influencing medium-term capacity planning.
The shutdown of Bollinger Motors highlighted capital and execution challenges in the electric commercial vehicle space, dampening expectations for startup-led volume growth and reinforcing market reliance on established OEMs.
FedEx’s investment in Harbinger validated purpose-built electric medium-duty commercial vehicle platforms, supporting its production road map and demonstrating that fleet-backed startups with defined use cases can selectively influence future volumes.
The Workhorse–Motiv merger reflected accelerating market consolidation, combining commercial vehicle manufacturing ambitions with fleet expertise to improve scale economics and production viability.
Mack Trucks’ launch of the Mack Pioneer at its Lehigh Valley facility reinforced its US manufacturing commitment and supported heavy-duty commercial vehicle production outlooks.
International continued US autonomous truck testing despite delayed commercialization, keeping autonomous-ready commercial vehicle platforms relevant for long-term, hub-to-hub freight forecasts.
Hyundai’s continued deployment and testing of XCIENT fuel cell trucks, including autonomous use cases, kept hydrogen powertrains on strategic road maps. 2025 reaffirmed hydrogen as a long-term opportunity, with cost pressures and infrastructure constraints pushing meaningful deployment volumes into the next decade.
Harbinger’s $100 million Series B funding in January 2025 supported medium-duty electric truck production for fleet applications such as last-mile and regional haul. This led to modest upward forecast revisions, though still below long-term, medium-duty EV growth levels forecasted in Q1 2025.
As hydrogen powertrain development timelines slipped, progress was constrained by the underdeveloped refueling infrastructure, particularly for heavy-duty and long-haul operations, which eroded fleet confidence and limited operational feasibility. Additionally, the persistently high cost of green hydrogen continued to weaken the total cost of ownership value proposition. In contrast, natural gas powertrains gained momentum as a more cost-effective and regulation-compliant alternative.
According to Escalent’s Commercial Vehicle Competitive Landscape Q3 2025 North American Powertrain Build Plan, hydrogen fuel-type share is expected to reach 0.08% in 2030 compared with 0.05% in 2024. However, natural gas is anticipated to gain further traction, with its share rising from 1.45% in 2024 to 2.11% in 2030. Growing fleet interest in renewable natural gas reinforced OEM commitments to sustain or expand natural gas offerings.
2025 proved to be less a year of disruption and more one of recalibration for the North American commercial vehicle industry. Regulatory volatility softened near-term demand pressures and enabled more streamlined production planning. OEMs doubled down on US manufacturing, startups faced consolidation pressures and powertrain strategies pivoted toward market-driven choices.
Over the next three years, here are three key takeaways for OEMs, suppliers and body manufacturers:
In sum, rather than derailing the long-term transition to electric powertrains, 2025 reset expectations—realigning commercial vehicle production forecasts with economic realities, infrastructure readiness and fleet priorities. This sets the stage for a more measured, resilient commercial vehicle market growth trajectory heading into 2026.
If you’d like to learn more about Escalent’s Commercial Vehicle Competitive Landscape offering or how our commercial vehicle and fleet industry experts can help you plan smarter and stay ahead by anticipating the changing powertrain and regulatory landscape, please fill out the form.