
Executive Summary: Most Favored Nation (MFN) policies are reshaping the drug pricing landscape, and this blog post examines what that means for pharma market research, from expanding global perspectives to informing pipeline and pricing strategy, and the new questions insight leaders must be ready to answer.
You may have heard the term “Most Favored Nation” (MFN) pop up in conversations about drug pricing. If it sounds abstract or policy-heavy to you, you’re not alone. At its core, MFN is a relatively simple idea, and it has very real implications for how pharmaceutical market research teams do their jobs.
First: What Is MFN?
A Most Favored Nation policy basically says:
The U.S. shouldn’t pay more for a drug than other similar countries do.
Under an MFN approach, the price paid in the U.S. (often through Medicare) could be linked to the lowest prices paid in other countries. The goal is to reduce U.S. drug spending by preventing big price gaps between the U.S. and the rest of the world.
Whether MFN policies are fully implemented or not, the idea alone may change how pharma companies think about drug pricing. It is key to continue to keep these potential changes in mind, along with the uncertainty associated with them.
“MFN policies don’t just adjust drug pricing. They redefine the reference point for value, forcing pharma organizations to think globally about decisions that were once made in isolation.” —Courtney Kerwin, Vice President, Health & Life Sciences
It is important to recognize that current MFN policies are being implemented via Executive Order. As a result, the framework remains subject to change, and its long-term structure is far from settled, particularly given limited signals that Congress will codify it in its current form. For stakeholders across the pharmaceutical ecosystem, this introduces uncertainty that extends beyond pricing strategy into how insights are generated and applied. Market research teams will need to prioritize flexibility in study design, ensuring approaches can adapt as policy details evolve. We will continue to monitor changes in the MFN landscape and revisit these implications as new developments emerge.
Because MFN changes the rules of the game for pricing, access and value perception.
For a long time, pharma companies have treated the U.S. as a separate, premium market. Market research often focused on:
MFN challenges that separation. If U.S. prices are tied to global prices, then what happens outside the U.S. suddenly matters a lot more. That shift, combined with an evolving policy landscape, means research can’t be static; it needs to be built to adapt.
If U.S. prices depend on prices elsewhere, market research can’t just ask:
“What will U.S. stakeholders accept?”
It also needs to consider:
That means more global thinking, even for teams focused on the U.S.
MFN policies aren’t always clear-cut. They might apply:
So instead of asking for one clear answer, leadership will want help with questions like:
Market research teams will be asked to run more scenario-based research, including pricing scenario modeling, policy impact forecasting and “what-if” simulations tied to MFN drug pricing rules, not just reporting what’s happening today.
“In an MFN-driven environment, the most valuable pharma research doesn’t describe what is. It anticipates what could be, helping leaders navigate uncertainty with confidence.” —Courtney Kerwin, Vice President, Health & Life Sciences
If you can’t rely on premium pricing, you have to rely more on clear, compelling value.
That puts pressure on market research to uncover:
In short, research needs to help teams explain why a drug is valuable, not just how much it costs and whether patients will have coverage and access.
MFN brings payers and policymakers closer to the center of decision-making.
Market research teams may need to:
This can feel unfamiliar for teams used to focusing mostly on clinicians or patients, but it’s becoming increasingly important. It represents a meaningful expansion of traditional research audiences.
MFN doesn’t just affect products on the market, it can influence which drugs get developed in the first place.
Research teams may be asked to help answer:
That pushes market research earlier in the decision process, especially for pipeline and portfolio planning.
Even if MFN policies aren’t fully rolled out yet, market research teams should keep an eye on:
As shifts in MFN policies reshape both the role of market researchers and the strategic insights pharma companies must prioritize, Escalent remains at the forefront, closely tracking these developments and translating them into actionable guidance for the industry. Most recently, Escalent’s president, Christopher Barnes, delivered a keynote at Intellus Worldwide 2026 examining the political forces driving drug pricing and showing how organizations can turn these insights into informed, effective strategies. Curious how these MFN policy changes could impact your market research or business strategy? Reach out to learn more.